The President and the Supreme Court
Going Public on Judicial Decisions from Washington to Trump

Examines the relationship between the president and the Supreme Court, including how presidents view the norm of judicial independence.

Paul M. Collins, Jr (Author), Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha (Author)

9781108498487, Cambridge University Press

Hardback, published 9 January 2020

284 pages
23.5 x 15.6 x 2 cm, 0.53 kg

'Collins and Eshbaugh-Soha's book is well written and would be an excellent addition to any undergraduate or graduate course on American political institutions. It is straight-forward, easy to follow, and rich with examples that provide helpful context.' Elizabeth Lane, Law and Politics Book Review

When presidents take positions on pending Supreme Court cases or criticize the Court's decisions, they are susceptible to being attacked for acting as bullies and violating the norm of judicial independence. Why then do presidents target Supreme Court decisions in their public appeals? In this book, Paul M. Collins, Jr and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha argue that presidents discuss the Court's decisions to demonstrate their responsiveness to important matters of public policy and to steer the implementation of the Court's decisions. Using data from Washington to Trump, they show that, far from being bullies, presidents discuss cases to promote their re-election, policy goals, and historical legacies, while attempting to affect the impact of Court decisions on the bureaucracy, Congress, the media, and the public.

1. Going public and the Supreme Court
2. Going public on pending decisions
3. Going public on decided cases
4. The tone of presidential rhetoric on Supreme Court decisions
5. Presidential calls to Congress
6. Presidential leadership of news coverage
7. Presidents and public opinion
8. Going public on Supreme Court cases before the modern presidency
9. Conclusions.

Subject Areas: Constitutional & administrative law [LND], Constitution: government & the state [JPHC], Politics & government [JP]