The Economic Realities of Political Reform
Elections and the US Senate

Regens and Gaddie argue that proposed political campaign finance reforms will not necessarily have the impact expected by advocates.

James L. Regens (Author), Ronald Keith Gaddie (Author)

9780521474689, Cambridge University Press

Hardback, published 28 April 1995

134 pages, 7 b/w illus. 19 tables
23.6 x 15.9 x 1.9 cm, 0.374 kg

"The book has an excellent statistical analysis that demonstrates the impact of money on winning..." Choice

A central political issue in American politics during the 1990s is the need for political campaign reform. The authors examine US Senate elections to determine the role money plays in Senate elections; their analysis indicates that the system of campaign finance resembles a market, with legislators as the recipients of financial largesse based on their institutional positions and political vulnerability. This rent-seeking relationship between economic interests and legislators has transformed the dynamic of Senate elections. The authors assess the potential impact of several electoral reform proposals. Spending limits and public funding proposals, they argue, will not have the impact expected by reform advocates. Term limit and public funding proposals would disrupt the rent-seeking relationship between legislators and economic interests. These proposals also face political and constitutional barriers to implementation.

List of tables and figures
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Introduction
1. The Senate in transition and campaign finance
2. Early money and profit-taking in Senate campaigns
3. Targeting rent-provision by major interests
4. Sitting in the cheap seats?
5. Implications for campaign finance reform
6. The future and the rent-seeking legislature
Notes
Bibliography
Index.

Subject Areas: Political economy [KCP]