"Slow cities give you more time. How that works goes to how we conceive and colonise planet Earth. Two new works bookend this question in a way that seems tailored to this particular historical instant. One is David Attenborough’s extraordinary new film, A Life on Our Planet, which recounts humanity’s "greatest mistake" – and how we can fix it. The other is a book – Slow Cities by Paul Tranter and Rodney Tolley – examining the same issue from the other end of the telescope.

The 20th century was focused largely on burning the past to expand the present. For a century, speed and efficiency have been our gods. But they’re dangerous and duplicitous deities, making us destroy our cities and our planet and still not delivering the promised time savings.

Our speed addiction is every bit as destructive as dependence on speed of the other sort. As with most destructive behaviours, the excuse is economic, but Tranter and Tolley point out that this too is illusory. Slow cities foster cafe economies: resilient, small-scale, healthy, with far lower health, land, infrastructure and transport costs. Plus there’s the economic benefit of actually surviving.

Planners, listen up. There’s not much point in building our way out of pandemic if it drives us over the cliff of climate change. The future, if we’re to have one, will be slower, closer and inestimably more interesting." --Farrelly, E. 2020, Build slower cities or keep careering towards disaster, Sydney Morning Herald, 17 October, 2020. A Sydney Morning Herald article by Elizabeth Farrelly provides a commentary on Slow Cities: Conquering our speed addiction for health and sustainability relating the ideas in the book to David Attenborough’s new film A Life On Our Planet.