Parliamentary Selection
Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England

Parliamentary Selection examines how members of Parliament were chosen from 1558–1702.

Mark A. Kishlansky (Author)

9780521311168, Cambridge University Press

Paperback, published 26 September 1986

276 pages
23.4 x 15.2 x 1.9 cm, 0.455 kg

'A startling thesis, brilliantly sustained, and written with wit and panache.' J. S. Morrill, Selwyn College, Cambridge

Parliamentary Selection examines the process by which members of Parliament were chosen in the period between the reigns of Elizabeth I and William III. By focusing on the nature of the selection process, rather than on its results, Professor Kishlansky uncovers a fundamental transformation in assumptions about political behaviour in the early modern period. Until the time of the English Revolution, selection of members of Parliament was a social process dominated by concern about rank and status, personal honor, and community solidarity. County elites organized their selections to reflect the realities of their local social structures, accounting for the influence of the county peerage and greater gentry. Borough elites used local patrons, officeholders, and denizens for nominations to their places. In both county and borough the principle of parliamentary selection was non-competitive choice.

Preface
Part I. Selections and Social Choice: 1. Parliamentary selection
2. Counties and boroughs
3. Contesting and composing
4. Addled selections
Part II. Elections and Political Choice: 5. The transition
6. Counties and boroughs
7. Contesting and winning
8. Hard-fought elections
Conclusion
Selected bibliography
Index.

Subject Areas: Early modern history: c 1450/1500 to c 1700 [HBLH], British & Irish history [HBJD1]