Freshly Printed - allow 7 days lead
Couldn't load pickup availability
Metaphysics and Epistemology
A Guided Anthology
“This is an excellent anthology. It combines a wide range of readings on the central and lasting questions of metaphysics and epistemology. The selections are imaginative and in many cases unusual, and Stephen Hetherington introduces each reading with a lucid and lively introduction. Highly recommended!” —Tim Crane, University of Cambridge "This comprehensive and creatively chosen anthology provides an excellent coverage of epistemological and metaphysical topics, from both historical and contemporary perspectives. It is highly recommended." —Duncan Pritchard, University of Edinburgh
Stephen Hetherington (Edited by), S Hetherington (Author)
9781118542583, Wiley
Paperback / softback, published 30 August 2013
480 pages
24.1 x 16.8 x 2.3 cm, 0.68 kg
Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Guided Anthology presents a comprehensive introductory overview of key themes, thinkers, and texts in metaphysics and epistemology.
Source Acknowledgments x Preface and Acknowledgments xv Introduction xvii Part I The Philosophical Image 1 1 Life and the Search for Philosophical Knowledge 3 2 Philosophical Questioning 14 3 Philosophy and Fundamental Images 20 4 Philosophy as the Analyzing of Key Concepts 27 5 Philosophy as Explaining Underlying Possibilities 33 Part II Metaphysics: Philosophical Images of Being 41 How Is the World at all Physical? 43 6 How Real Are Physical Objects? 43 7 Are Physical Objects Never Quite as They Appear To Be? 48 8 Are Physical Objects Really Only Objects of Thought? 54 9 Is Even the Mind Physical? 60 10 Is the Physical World All There Is? 66 How Does the World Function? 74 11 Is Causation Only a Kind of Regularity? 74 12 Is Causation Something Singular and Unanalyzable? 81 How Do Things Ever Have Qualities? 88 13 How Can Individual Things Have Repeatable Qualities? 88 14 How Can Individual Things Not Have Repeatable Qualities? 95 How Are There Any Truths? 102 15 Do Facts Make True Whatever Is True? 102 16 Are There Social Facts? 107 17 Is There Only Personally Decided Truth? 114 How Is There a World At All? 120 18 Has the World Been Designed by God? 120 19 Is God’s Existence Knowable Purely Conceptually? 131 20 Has This World Been Actualized by God from Among All Possible Worlds? 145 21 Does This World Exist Because It Has Value Independently of God? 149 22 Can Something Have Value in Itself? 158 How Are Persons Persons? 161 23 Is Each Person a Union of Mind and Body? 161 24 Is Self-Consciousness what Constitutes a Person? 164 25 How Strictly Does Self-Consciousness Constitute a Person? 170 26 Are Persons Constituted with Strict Identity At All? 177 27 Are We Animals? 187 How Do People Ever Have Free Will and Moral Responsibility? 196 28 Is There No Possibility of Acting Differently To How One Will in Fact Act? 196 29 Could Our Being Entirely Caused Coexist with Our Acting Freely? 200 30 Would Being Entirely Caused Undermine Our Personally Constitutive Emotions? 206 31 Is a Person Morally Responsible Only for Actions Performed Freely? 213 32 Is Moral Responsibility for a Good Action Different to Moral Responsibility for a Bad Action? 218 How Could a Person Be Harmed by Being Dead? 224 33 Is It Impossible To Be Harmed by Being Dead? 224 34 Is It Impossible To Be Harmed by Being Dead at a Particular Time? 226 35 Would Immortality Be Humanly Possible and Desirable? 229 36 Can a Person be Deprived of Benefits by Being Dead? 236 Further Readings for Part II 240 Part III Epistemology: Philosophical Images of Knowing 245 Can We Understand What It Is to Know? 247 37 Is Knowledge a Supported True Belief? 247 38 When Should a Belief be Supported by Evidence? 251 39 Is Knowledge a Kind of Objective Certainty? 256 40 Are All Fallibly Supported True Beliefs Instances of Knowledge? 260 41 Must a True Belief Arise Aptly, if it is to be Knowledge? 264 42 Must a True Belief Arise Reliably, if it is to be Knowledge? 268 43 Where is the Value in Knowing? 273 44 Is Knowledge Always a Virtuously Derived True Belief? 279 Can We Ever Know Just through Observation? 287 45 Is All Knowledge Ultimately Observational? 287 46 Is There a Problem of Not Knowing that One Is Not Dreaming? 292 47 What Is It Really to be Seeing Something? 295 48 Is There a Possibility of Being a Mere and Unknowing Brain in a Vat? 302 49 Is It Possible to Observe Directly the Objective World? 311 Can We Ever Know Innately? 317 50 Is It Possible to Know Innately Some Geometrical or Mathematical Truths? 317 51 Is There No Innate Knowledge At All? 325 Can We Ever Know Just through Reflection? 335 52 Is All Knowledge Ultimately Reflective? 335 53 Can Reflective Knowledge Be Substantive and Informative? 340 54 Is All Apparently Reflective Knowledge Ultimately Observational? 349 55 Is Scientific Reflection Our Best Model for Understanding Reflection? 355 56 Are Some Necessities Known through Observation, Not Reflection? 363 Can We Know in Other Fundamental Ways? 369 57 Is Knowing-How a Distinct Way of Knowing? 369 58 Is Knowing One’s Intention-in-Action a Distinct Way of Knowing? 376 59 Is Knowing via What Others Say or Write a Distinct Way of Knowing? 383 60 Is Knowing through Memory a Distinct Way of Knowing? 391 Can We Fundamentally Fail Ever To Know? 399 61 Are None of our Beliefs More Justifiable than Others? 399 62 Are None of Our Beliefs Immune from Doubt? 407 63 Are We Unable Ever To Extrapolate Justifiedly Beyond Our Observations? 410 Can Skeptical Arguments Be Escaped? 417 64 Can We Know at Least Our Conscious Mental Lives? 417 65 Can We Know Some Fundamental Principles by Common Sense? 422 66 Do We Know a Lot, but Always Fallibly? 434 67 Is It Possible to have Knowledge even when Not Knowing that One Is Not a Brain in a Vat? 444 Further Readings for Part III 452
Plato, Republic
Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy
Wilfrid Sellars, “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man”
P.F. Strawson, Analysis and Metaphysics
Robert Nozick, Philosophical Explanations
Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy
John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
George Berkeley, The Principles of Human Knowledge
D.M. Armstrong, “The Causal Theory of the Mind”
Frank Jackson, “Epiphenomenal Qualia”
David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
G.E.M. Anscombe, “Causation and Determination”
Plato, Parmenides
D.M. Armstrong, Nominalism and Realism
Bertrand Russell, “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism”
John Searle, Mind, Language and Society
Plato, Theaetetus
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
St. Anselm, Proslogion
G.W. Leibniz, Monadology
Nicholas Rescher, Nature and Understanding
Plato, Euthyphro
René Descartes, “Meditation VI”
John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
Roderick M. Chisholm, “Identity through Time”
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons
Eric T. Olson, “An Argument for Animalism”
Aristotle, De Interpretatione
David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
P.F. Strawson, “Freedom and Resentment”
Harry G. Frankfurt, “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”
Susan Wolf, “Asymmetrical Freedom”
Epicurus, “Letter to Menoeceus”
Lucretius, De Rerum Natura
Bernard Williams, “The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality”
Fred Feldman, Confrontations with the Reaper
Plato, Meno
W.K. Clifford, “The Ethics of Belief”
A.J. Ayer, The Problem of Knowledge
Edmund L. Gettier, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”
Alvin I. Goldman, “A Causal Theory of Knowing”
Alvin I. Goldman, “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”
Catherine Z. Elgin, “The Epistemic Efficacy of Stupidity”
Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski, Virtues of the Mind
David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
René Descartes, “Meditation I”
David Lewis, “Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision”
Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth and History
John McDowell, “The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument”
Plato, Meno
John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
René Descartes, Discourse on Method
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason
John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic
C.S. Peirce, “Some Consequences of Four Incapacities” and “How To Make Our Ideas Clear”
Saul A. Kripke, Naming and Necessity
Gilbert Ryle, “Knowing How and Knowing That”
G.E.M. Anscombe, Intention
Jennifer Lackey, “Knowing from Testimony”
Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Mind
Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism
René Descartes, “Meditation I”
David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
René Descartes, “Meditation II”
Thomas Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man
Karl R. Popper, “On the Sources of Knowledge and of Ignorance”
Robert Nozick, Philosophical Explanations
Subject Areas: Philosophy [HP]
