Doubt in Islamic Law
A History of Legal Maxims, Interpretation, and Islamic Criminal Law

This book considers the rarely studied but pervasive concepts of doubt that medieval Muslim jurists used to resolve problematic criminal cases.

Intisar A. Rabb (Author)

9781107440517, Cambridge University Press

Paperback / softback, published 2 November 2017

430 pages, 2 tables
23 x 15.3 x 2.5 cm, 0.6 kg

'Even for aficionados of progressive legal interpretation who only dabble in Islamic legal theory, among whom this reviewer is most certainly included, the 'closing of the gates of ijtiha?d' is a concept that is known and, for the most part, feared - but Rabb puts a new spin on that understanding.' M. Christian Green, Journal of Law and Religion

This book considers an important and largely neglected area of Islamic law by exploring how medieval Muslim jurists resolved criminal cases that could not be proven beyond a doubt, calling into question a controversial popular notion about Islamic law today, which is that Islamic law is a divine legal tradition that has little room for discretion or doubt, particularly in Islamic criminal law. Despite its contemporary popularity, that notion turns out to have been far outside the mainstream of Islamic law for most of its history. Instead of rejecting doubt, medieval Muslim scholars largely embraced it. In fact, they used doubt to enlarge their own power and to construct Islamic criminal law itself. Through examination of legal, historical, and theological sources, and a range of illustrative case studies, this book shows that Muslim jurists developed a highly sophisticated and regulated system for dealing with Islam's unique concept of doubt, which evolved from the seventh to the sixteenth century.

Introduction
Part I. Institutional Structures and Doubt, Seventh–Sixteenth Century CE: 1. The God of severity and lenity
2. The rise of doubt
Part II. Morality and Social Context, Eighth–Eleventh Century CE: 3. Hierarchy and hudud laws, eighth–ninth century CE
4. Doubt as moral discomfort, tenth–eleventh century CE
Part III. The Jurisprudence of Doubt, Eighth–Sixteenth Century CE: 5. Doubt as an element of Islamic criminal law, eighth–eleventh century CE
6. Substantive, procedural, and interpretive doubt, eleventh–sixteenth century CE
7. Strict textualism as a limitation on doubt: Sunni opponents, eighth–eleventh century CE
8. Dueling theories of delegation and interpretation: Shi'i doubt, tenth–sixteenth century CE
Conclusion: doubt in comparative and contemporary context.

Subject Areas: Legal history [LAZ], Islam [HRH], Middle Eastern history [HBJF1]