{"product_id":"just-the-arguments-100-of-the-most-important-arguments-in-western-philosophy-hardback-9781444336375","title":"Just the Arguments; 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy (Hardback) 9781444336375","description":"\u003cfont face=\"Georgia\"\u003e\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"6\"\u003eJust the Arguments\u003c\/font\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\r\n\u003cfont size=\"5\"\u003e100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"4\"\u003eMichael Bruce (Edited by), M Bruce (Author), Steven Barbone (Edited by)\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e9781444336375, Wiley\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003eHardback, published 30 September 2011\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e432 pages\u003cbr\u003e23.9 x 16.5 x 2.8 cm, 0.735 kg\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"justify\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e“A useful resource for an undergraduate library, this book also would be suitable for undergraduate courses, particularly introduction to philosophy, logic, and critical thinking.  Summing Up: Highly recommended.  Lower-level undergraduates and general readers.”  (\u003ci\u003eChoice\u003c\/i\u003e, 1 September 2012)\u003c\/p\u003e\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"justify\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eDoes the existence of evil call into doubt the existence of God? Show me the argument.\u003c\/b\u003e Philosophy starts with questions, but attempts at answers are just as important, and these answers require reasoned argument. Cutting through dense philosophical prose, 100 famous and influential arguments are presented in their essence, with premises, conclusions and logical form plainly identified. Key quotations provide a sense of style and approach. \u003ci\u003eJust the Arguments\u003c\/i\u003e is an invaluable one-stop argument shop. \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003eA concise, formally structured summation of 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eThe first book of its kind to present the most important and influential philosophical arguments in a clear premise\/conclusion format, the language that philosophers use and students are expected to know\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eOffers succinct expositions of key philosophical arguments without bogging them down in commentary\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eTranslates difficult texts to core arguments\u003c\/li\u003e \u003cli\u003eDesigned to provides a quick and compact reference to everything from Aquinas’ “Five Ways” to prove the existence of God, to the metaphysical possibilities of a zombie world\u003c\/li\u003e \u003c\/ul\u003e\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments xiv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntroduction: Show Me the Arguments 1\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMichael Bruce and Steven Barbone\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart I Philosophy of Religion 7\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 Aquinas’ Five Ways 9\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eTimothy J. Pawl\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 The Contingency Cosmological Argument 18\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMark T. Nelson\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 The Kalam Argument for the Existence of God 22\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eHarry Lesser\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 The Ontological Argument 25\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eSara L. Uckelman\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 Pascal’s Wager 28\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLeslie Burkholder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 James’ Will to Believe Argument 32\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eA. T. Fyfe\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 The Problem of Evil 35\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMichael Bruce and Steven Barbone\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8 The Free Will Defense to the Problem of Evil 37\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGrant Sterling\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 St. Anselm on Free Choice and the Power to Sin 40\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJulia Hermann\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 Hume’s Argument against Miracles 44\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eTommaso Piazza\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11 The Euthyphro Dilemma 49\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDavid Baggett\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12 Nietzsche’s Death of God 52\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eTom Grimwood\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e13 Ockham’s Razor 57\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGrant Sterling\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart II Metaphysics 59\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e14 Parmenides’ Refutation of Change 61\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAdrian Bardon\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 McTaggart’s Argument against the Reality of Time 64\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eM. Joshua Mozersky\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 Berkeley’s Master Argument for Idealism 68\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJohn M. DePoe\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e17 Kant’s Refutation of Idealism 70\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAdrian Bardon\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e18 The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus 73\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLudger Jansen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e19 Lewis’ Argument for Possible Worlds 76\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDavid Vander Laan\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e20 A Reductionist Account of Personal Identity 79\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eFauve Lybaert\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e21 Split-Case Arguments about Personal Identity 86\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLudger Jansen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e22 The Ship of Theseus 88\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLudger Jansen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e23 The Problem of Temporary Intrinsics 90\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMontserrat Bordes\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e24 A Modern Modal Argument for the Soul 93\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRafal Urbaniak and Agnieszka Rostalska\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e25 Two Arguments for the Harmlessness of Death 99 Epicurus’ Death is Nothing to Us Argument 99\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eSteven Luper\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLucretius’ Symmetry Argument 100\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eNicolas Bommarito\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e26 The Existence of Forms: Plato’s Argument from the Possibility of Knowledge 102\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJurgis (George) Brakas\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e27 Plato, Aristotle, and the Third Man Argument 106\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJurgis (George) Brakas\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e28 Logical Monism 111\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLuis Estrada-González\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e29 The Maximality Paradox 115\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eNicola Ciprotti\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e30 An Argument for Free Will 119\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGerald Harrison\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e31 Frankfurt’s Refutation of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities 121\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGerald Harrison\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e32 Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument against Compatibilism 123\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGrant Sterling\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e33 Fatalism 125\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eFernando Migura and Agustin Arrieta\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e34 Sartre’s Argument for Freedom 128\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJeffrey Gordon\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart III Epistemology 131\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e35 The Cogito Arguments of Descartes and Augustine 133\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescartes’ Cogito 133\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJoyce Lazier\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAugustine’s “Si fallor, sum” Argument (If I Am Mistaken, I Exist) 135\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBrett Gaul\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e36 The Cartesian Dreaming Argument for External-World Skepticism 137\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eStephen Hetherington\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e37 The Transparency of Experience Argument 142\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eCarlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e38 The Regress Argument for Skepticism 146\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eScott Aikin\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e39 Moore’s Anti-Skeptical Arguments 152\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMatthew Frise\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 The Bias Paradox 154\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDeborah Heikes\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e41 Gettier’s Argument against the Traditional Account of Knowledge 156\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJohn M. DePoe\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e42 Putnam’s Argument against Cultural Imperialism 159\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMaria Caamaño\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e43 Davidson on the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme 162\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGeorge Wrisley\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e44 Quine’s Two Dogmas of Empiricism 169\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRobert Sinclair\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e45 Hume and the Problem of Induction 174\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHume’s Problem of Induction 174\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJames E. Taylor\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHume’s Negative Argument concerning Induction 176\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eStefanie Rocknak\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e46 Argument by Analogy in Thales and Anaximenes 180\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGiannis Stamatellos\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e47 Quine’s Epistemology Naturalized 183\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRobert Sinclair\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e48 Sellars and the Myth of the Given 188\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eWillem A. deVries\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e49 Sellars’ “Rylean Myth” 193\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eWillem A. deVries\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 Aristotle and the Argument to End All Arguments 198\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eToni Vogel Carey\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart IV Ethics 201\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e51 Justice Brings Happiness in Plato’s Republic 203\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJoshua I. Weinstein\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e52 Aristotle’s Function Argument 208\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eSean McAleer\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e53 Aristotle’s Argument that Goods are Irreducible 211\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJurgis (George) Brakas\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e54 Aristotle’s Argument for Perfectionism 214\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eEric J. Silverman\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e55 Categorical Imperative as the Source for Morality 217\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJoyce Lazier\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e56 Kant on Why Autonomy Deserves Respect 221\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMark Piper\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e57 Mill’s Proof of Utilitarianism 223\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eA. T. Fyfe\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e58 The Experience Machine Objection to Hedonism 229\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDan Weijers\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e59 The Error Theory Argument 232\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRobert L. Muhlnickel\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e60 Moore’s Open Question Argument 237\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBruno Verbeek\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e61 Wolff’s Argument for the Rejection of State Authority 240\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBen Saunders\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e62 Nozick’s Taxation Is Forced Labor Argument 242\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJason Waller\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e63 Charity is Obligatory 244\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJoakim Sandberg\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e64 The Repugnant Conclusion 247\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJoakim Sandberg\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e65 Taurek on Numbers Don’t Count 249\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBen Saunders\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e66 Parfit’s Leveling Down Argument against Egalitarianism 251\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBen Saunders\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e67 Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain Argument 254\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eFabian Wendt\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e68 Liberal Feminism 258\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJulinna C. Oxley\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e69 Moral Status of Animals from Marginal Cases 263\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJulia Tanner\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e70 The Ethical Vegetarianism Argument 265\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRobert L. Muhlnickel\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e71 Thomson and the Famous Violinist 269\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLeslie Burkholder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e72 Marquis and the Immorality of Abortion 273\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLeslie Burkholder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e73 Tooley on Abortion and Infanticide 275\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eBen Saunders\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e74 Rachels on Euthanasia 277\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLeslie Burkholder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart V Philosophy of Mind 281\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e75 Leibniz’ Argument for Innate Ideas 283\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eByron Kaldis\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e76 Descartes’ Arguments for the Mind–Body Distinction 290\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDale Jacquette\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e77 Princess Elisabeth and the Mind–Body Problem 297\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eJen McWeeny\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e78 Kripke’s Argument for Mind–Body Property Dualism 301\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eDale Jacquette\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e79 The Argument from Mental Causation for Physicalism 304\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmir Horowitz\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e80 Davidson’s Argument for Anomalous Monism 308\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmir Horowitz\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e81 Putnam’s Multiple Realization Argument against Type-Physicalism 311\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmir Horowitz\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e82 The Supervenience Argument against Non-Reductive Physicalism 314\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAndrew Russo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e83 Ryle’s Argument against Cartesian Internalism 318\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAgustin Arrieta and Fernando Migura\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e84 Jackson’s Knowledge Argument 320\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmir Horowitz\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e85 Nagel’s “What Is It Like to Be a Bat” Argument against Physicalism 324\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmy Kind\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e86 Chalmer’s Zombie Argument 327\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eAmy Kind\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e87 The Argument from Revelation 330\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eCarlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e88 Searle and the Chinese Room Argument 334\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLeslie Burkholder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart VI Science and Language 337\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e89 Sir Karl Popper’s Demarcation Argument 339\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLiz Stillwaggon Swan\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e90 Kuhn’s Incommensurability Arguments 341\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLiz Stillwaggon Swan and Michael Bruce\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e91 Putnam’s No Miracles Argument 344\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLiz Stillwaggon Swan\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e92 Galileo’s Falling Bodies 346\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eLiz Stillwaggon Swan\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e93 Eliminative Materialism 348\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eCharlotte Blease\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e94 Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument 350\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eGeorge Wrisley\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e95 Fodor’s Argument for Linguistic Nativism 355\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMajid Amini\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e96 Fodor and the Impossibility of Learning 359\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMajid Amini\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e97 Quine on the Indeterminacy of Translation 362\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eRobert Sinclair\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e98 Davidson’s Argument for the Principle of Charity 367\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eMaria Caamaño\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e99 Frege’s Argument for Platonism 370\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eIvan Kasa\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 Mathematical Platonism 373\u003cbr\u003e \u003ci\u003eNicolas Pain\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAppendix A: Learning the Logical Lingo 377\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAppendix B: Rules of Inference and Replacement 378\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes on Contributors 380\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndex 391\u003c\/p\u003e\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003eSubject Areas: Philosophy [\u003ca title=\"See our other books on Philosophy\" href=\"https:\/\/freshlyprintedbooks.co.uk\/search?q=%22Philosophy%20%5BHP%5D%22\"\u003eHP\u003c\/a\u003e]\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003c\/font\u003e","brand":"Wiley-Blackwell","offers":[{"title":"Brand New","offer_id":52173825966360,"sku":"9781444336375","price":69.89,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0730\/2037\/5320\/files\/9781444336375.jpg?v=1781173705","url":"https:\/\/freshlyprintedbooks.co.uk\/products\/just-the-arguments-100-of-the-most-important-arguments-in-western-philosophy-hardback-9781444336375","provider":"Freshly Printed Books","version":"1.0","type":"link"}