{"product_id":"feminist-judgments-immigration-law-opinions-rewritten-hardback-9781009198936","title":"Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten (Hardback) 9781009198936","description":"\u003cfont face=\"Georgia\"\u003e\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"6\"\u003eFeminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten\u003c\/font\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThis book shows how critical feminist reasoning can reshape the current immigration legal regime in the United States.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"4\"\u003eKathleen Kim (Edited by), Kevin Lapp (Edited by), Jennifer Lee (Edited by)\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e9781009198936, Cambridge University Press\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003eHardback, published 2 November 2023\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e378 pages\u003cbr\u003e23.5 x 15.9 x 2.5 cm, 0.68 kg\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"justify\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e'Informed by the insights of feminist legal theory and critical race theory, these authors reimagine landmark Supreme Court immigration cases. The rewritten opinions illustrate how a more generous legal imagination could have avoided past injustices, and show us how law can better serve the ends of justice going forward.' Jennifer Chacon, University of California, Berkeley School of Law\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"justify\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003eThis volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity.\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003e1. Introduction Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp and Jennifer J. Lee\u003cbr\u003e 2. Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 US 275 (1875) Julie Dahlstrom and Stewart Chang\u003cbr\u003e 3. Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 US 651 (1892) Eunice C. Lee and Stella Burch Elias\u003cbr\u003e 4. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649 (1898) Rachel Rosenbloom and Jonathan Weinberg\u003cbr\u003e 5. United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 US 204 (1923) Jaya Ramji-Nogales and Joy Kanwar\u003cbr\u003e 6. Landon v. Plasencia, 459 US 21 (1982) Sabrina Balgamwalla and Erin Corcoran\u003cbr\u003e 7. Plyler v. Doe, 457 US 202 (1982) Michael Olivas and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia\u003cbr\u003e 8. Jean v. Nelson, 472 US 846 (1985) Raymond Audain and Patricia Winograd\u003cbr\u003e 9. Reno v. Flores, 507 US 292 (1993) Lindsay Harris and Julia Hernández\u003cbr\u003e 10. Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 US 678 (2001) Nicole Hallett, Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton\u003cbr\u003e 11. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 US 137 (2002) Ruben Garcia and Kati Griffith\u003cbr\u003e 12. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 US 356 (2010) Jack Chin and Marissa Montes\u003cbr\u003e 13. Arizona v. United States, 567 US 387 (2012) Kristina Campbell and Annie Lai\u003cbr\u003e 14. Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) Ahilan Arulanantham, Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel\u003cbr\u003e 15. Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) Kevin Johnson and Jennifer Lee Koh.\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cfont size=\"3\"\u003eSubject Areas: International law [\u003ca title=\"See our other books on International law\" href=\"https:\/\/freshlyprintedbooks.co.uk\/search?q=%22International%20law%20%5BLB%5D%22\"\u003eLB\u003c\/a\u003e]\u003c\/font\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003c\/font\u003e","brand":"Cambridge University Press","offers":[{"title":"Brand New","offer_id":52410830061848,"sku":"9781009198936","price":83.89,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0730\/2037\/5320\/files\/9781009198936i.jpg?v=1784252467","url":"https:\/\/freshlyprintedbooks.co.uk\/products\/feminist-judgments-immigration-law-opinions-rewritten-hardback-9781009198936","provider":"Freshly Printed Books","version":"1.0","type":"link"}